by hollyshannensangel » Sat Apr 03, 2004 2:43 pm
Not really sure he's protective but at the end of the day which parent doesn't want to protect their child? If that means being harsh then so be it I believe he was in the right so there were times when he wasn't but aside from that I believe he was...parents will do anything to keep they child in a safe, protected and loved enviroment and if that means keeping the safety net which protects their child then that's what they will do, as they would never want to see anything bad happen to their child and if something bad was to happen then the parent/s would only blame themselves and therefore, I think Jim was in the right and is not over protective.